Lisa Zaar vs Emily Seibold Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 Oct at 10:46 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Zaar vs E. Seibold

SWE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Zaar 1 - 0 Seibold
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lisa Zaar winning 2 and Emily Seibold winning 0. The last match between Lisa Zaar and Emily Seibold was at the W35 Santa Margherita di Pula, 08-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Lisa Zaar getting the victory 6-1 7-6(3).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zaar | 1 |
| Seibold | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Santa Margherita di Pula(10-08-25)
L. Zaar vs E. Seibold H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.29% (116-83) | Career Total W/L | 54.55% (198-165) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Zaar vs E. Seibold Match Preview:
- When examining second serve effectiveness, Lisa Zaar has recently managed to capture 36.21% of points compared to Emily Seibold's 33.53%. Could this give Lisa an advantage?
- Regarding the return game, Zaar has secured 54.64% against her opponent’s second serve, whereas Seibold lags slightly behind at 48.96%.
- Analyzing first serve returns, Lisa has a 39.37% success rate, outshining Emily’s 34.17%. Does this suggest a defensive edge for Lisa?
- In pressure situations, Zaar has a slight edge by saving 47.75% of breakpoints, versus Seibold’s 46.89%.
- Looking back over the past year, Emily Seibold boasts a slightly higher win ratio at 61.67% compared to Lisa's 57.58%.
- When considering surface preferences, both players thrive on hard surfaces; however, Lisa Zaar fares better on I.hard at 59%, while Emily is strong on Hard at 59% as well.
- Both players frequent the Challengers/ITF > $10K tournaments, with Emily having a marginally higher match win percentage than Lisa.
- Seibold has faced more challenging opponents, whose average rank stands at 379, justifying her slightly stronger match performance.
- In close encounters, the two have nearly parallel records with Lisa winning 59% of deciding sets, and Emily demonstrating a 60% success rate.
- Specific current event statistics weren't provided, yet they hold importance for a comprehensive understanding of today's form.
Editorial Prediction (October 8, 2025, UTC):
The analysis shows a comparative closeness between Lisa Zaar and Emily Seibold, with each displaying individual strengths.
Lisa Zaar exhibits slight advantages in return and under pressure gameplay with her ability to capture second serve points more effectively, although Emily Seibold has faced stronger competition overall, which adds weight to her experience.
Once the court surface comes into play, both excel under similar conditions, signifying a well-matched contest in this aspect.
Given these insights, Emily Seibold appears marginally more poised to secure a victory in the upcoming match, due to her overall winning percentage and caliber of opponents faced.
Lisa Zaar vs Emily Seibold Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Zaar vs E. Seibold H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:21:59 | Average Match Time | 2:21:59 |
| 77% (49/64) | 1st Serve % | 50% (45/90) |
| 69% (34/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (20/45) |
| 20% (3/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (21/45) |
| 33% (6/18) | Break Pts Won % | 60% (3/5) |
| 54% (49/90) | Return Points Win % | 42% (27/64) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Zaar Recent Matches Played
E. Seibold Recent Matches Played

L. Zaar vs E. Seibold Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.29% (116/83) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.55% (198/165) |
| 56.55% (259/199) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.24% (443/359) |
| 53.31% (2237/1959) | Games Win/Loss | 53.42% (3732/3254) |
| 58.93% (33/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.58% (38/28) |
| 57.89% (66/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.94% (146/115) |
| 58.62% (17/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.89% (14/22) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 29 | Aces Total | 463 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 740 | Total Double Faults | 1051 |
| 1:41:15 | Average Match Time | 1:19:25 |
| 434.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 465.1 |
| 73% (8603/11815) | 1st Serve % | 61% (10420/17207) |
| 56% (4843/8603) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (6279/10420) |
| 42% (1341/3212) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (2989/6787) |
| 51% (873/1705) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1230/2441) |
| 51% (5933/11741) | Return Points Win % | 48% (8579/17809) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.64% (74/59) | Challenger W/L | 47.78% (86/94) |
| 66.67% (42/21) | Futures W/L | 61.20% (112/71) |
| 59% (115/196) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (195/348) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 54% (27/50) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (18/50) |
| 57% (36/63) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (41/85) |
| 88% (114/100) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (201/179) |
| 11% (114/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (201/22) |
| 19% (85/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (162/21) |